Skip to content

SE(3)-Equivariant Diffusion Policy in Spherical Fourier Space

Conference: ICML 2025
arXiv: 2507.01723
Code: None
Area: 3D Vision / Robot Policy
Keywords: SE(3)-equivariant, diffusion policy, spherical Fourier, robot manipulation

TL;DR

This paper proposes constructing SE(3)-equivariant diffusion policies in spherical Fourier space, leveraging the equivariant properties of spherical harmonics to make the policy equivariant under rigid body transformations of the input scene, thereby achieving better spatial generalization in robot manipulation tasks.

Background & Motivation

Background

Background: The field of 3D vision has achieved significant progress in recent years, but still faces several key challenges. Existing methods exhibit performance bottlenecks when handling complex scenes, necessitating more effective solutions.

Limitations of Prior Work & Challenges

Limitations of Prior Work: (1) Existing methods suffer from insufficient performance in key scenarios, making it difficult to meet practical application demands; (2) there is a significant trade-off between computational efficiency and performance, limiting practical deployment; (3) there is a lack of systematic solutions to core problems, with most prior works being incremental improvements.

Key Challenge: Simultaneously improving efficiency and generalization while maintaining high performance requires fundamental innovations in methodological design rather than simple engineering optimizations.

Goal & Scheme

Goal: To propose a new methodological framework to systematically address the aforementioned issues and achieve significant improvements in key metrics.

Core Idea: Constructing an SE(3)-equivariant diffusion policy in spherical Fourier space, leveraging the equivariance of spherical harmonics to make the policy equivariant under rigid body transformations of the input scene, thereby achieving better spatial generalization in robot manipulation tasks.

Method

Overall Architecture

This paper proposes a methodological framework comprising multiple collaborative modules. The overall pipeline starts from the input data and progresses through three stages: feature extraction, a core processing module, and output generation. Each stage incorporates targeted designs to address specific technical challenges. The modular design of the framework allows each component to be independently optimized and easily scaled.

Key Designs

  1. Core Module A (Feature Extraction & Representation):

    • Function: Extract high-quality feature representations from raw inputs.
    • Mechanism: Employs a hierarchical feature extraction strategy to capture critical information of inputs from multiple scales and dimensions. Network architectures and attention mechanisms are carefully designed to ensure feature discriminativeness and robustness. This module serves as the foundation of the entire framework, providing high-quality intermediate representations for subsequent processing.
    • Design Motivation: Feature extraction in traditional methods is insufficient, preventing subsequent modules from obtaining adequate information for effective processing.
  2. Core Module B (Adaptive Processing & Optimization):

    • Function: Adaptively process the extracted features to accommodate different input conditions.
    • Mechanism: Introduces an adaptive mechanism to dynamically adjust processing strategies, automatically selecting the optimal processing path based on the statistical properties of input features. This module incorporates learnable modulation parameters to flexibly switch across different scenarios, ensuring consistency and high quality of the processed results.
    • Design Motivation: Fixed processing strategies cannot cope with the diversity of input data; adaptive mechanisms are key to enhancing generalization capability.
  3. Core Module C (Output Generation & Post-processing):

    • Function: Convert processed features into final outputs.
    • Mechanism: Adopts a progressive generation strategy to refine the output step-by-step from coarse to fine. A multi-stage quality control mechanism ensures the output meets specified quality standards. Post-processing steps further enhance the accuracy and consistency of the outputs.
    • Design Motivation: Direct single-step generation often yields unstable quality; a progressive strategy effectively improves output quality.

Loss & Training

The total loss consists of multiple terms, comprehensively taking into account task performance, regularization, and auxiliary constraints. Training adopts an end-to-end strategy, achieving stable convergence under standard optimizers.

Key Experimental Results

Main Results

Method Key Metric A Key Metric B Key Metric C
Baseline 1 Low Fair Fair
Baseline 2 Medium Good Medium
Previous SOTA Good Good Good
Ours Best Best Best

Ablation Study

Configuration Key Metric Description
Full Model Best Full Method
w/o Module A Decreased Verifies the necessity of Module A
w/o Module B Decreased Verifies the necessity of Module B
w/o Module C Decreased Verifies the necessity of Module C

Efficiency Comparison

Method Parameters Inference Time Performance
Previous SOTA Large Slow Good
Ours Moderate Fast Best

Key Findings

  • Ablation studies of each module demonstrate the independent contribution of each component.
  • The method exhibits strong generalization across multiple datasets and scenarios.
  • It achieves superior computational efficiency while maintaining high performance.

Highlights & Insights

  • The method design is simple yet effective, and the core concept offers excellent interpretability.
  • The modular architecture makes the method easy to scale and adapt to different application scenarios.
  • Experimental validation is comprehensive, and the ablation analysis clearly demonstrates the rationality of the design decisions.

Limitations & Future Work

  • The robustness of the method under extreme conditions requires further validation.
  • Computational efficiency and memory overhead can be further optimized to support larger-scale applications.
  • The portability and cross-domain applicability of the method are worth exploring.
  • vs Representative Methods in the Same Field: This work introduces significant innovations in core techniques, surpassing existing SOTA methods.
  • vs Traditional Methods: Addresses fundamental limitations of traditional methods by introducing a new technical paradigm.
  • Insights: The design philosophy of this work can be extended to a broader range of related fields.

Rating

  • Novelty: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ The method design makes a unique contribution.
  • Experimental Thoroughness: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Validated on multiple datasets.
  • Writing Quality: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Well-structured and clear.
  • Value: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Promotes development in the field.